Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Waukesha area census tracts by residents below the poverty level

Residents below the poverty level is highest in Waukesha village (west) (23%). This table ranks 98 eligible mapped census tracts.

Residents below the poverty level values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaResidents below the poverty level
1Waukesha village (west)23%
2Menomonee Falls village (northeast)19.6%
3Waukesha city (southwest 1)18.3%
4Waukesha city (north-northwest)17.6%
5Waukesha city (northwest)16%
6Oconomowoc city (southeast)15.7%
7Waukesha city (southeast)15.4%
8Waukesha city (east)15.3%
9Waukesha city (north-northeast)14.6%
10Summit village (north)12.4%
11Sussex village (southeast)11.1%
12Pewaukee city (southeast)10.8%
13Waukesha city (east-northeast)10.8%
14Waukesha city (southwest 2)10.8%
15New Berlin city (west 2)10.2%
16Waukesha village (northwest)10%
17Wales village (east-northeast)9.6%
18Elm Grove village (east-southeast)9.3%
19Butler village (east-northeast)9.1%
20Wales village (north-northeast)9%
21New Berlin city (west 1)8.9%
22Hartland village (north-northwest)8.4%
23Pewaukee city (north)8.3%
24New Berlin city (west-northwest)8.1%
25Pewaukee city (east)8.1%
26Wales village (northeast)8.1%
27Pewaukee city (west)7%
28Lannon village (north)6.9%
29Summit village (south)6.7%
30Chenequa village (southeast)6.5%
31Brookfield city (south-southeast)6.3%
32Muskego city (north)5.7%
33Waukesha village (north)5.7%
34Muskego city (south)5.6%
35Oconomowoc city (south-southwest)5.6%
36Wales village (west-northwest)5.6%
37Brookfield city (east)5.2%
38Elm Grove village (southwest)5.2%
39Eagle village (west)5%
40Pewaukee village (west)4.9%
41Menomonee Falls village (northwest)4.7%
42Okauchee Lake CDP (west)4.7%
43Brookfield city (west-northwest)4.5%
44New Berlin city (north-northeast)4.5%
45Okauchee Lake CDP (east-northeast)4.5%
46New Berlin city (northwest)4.4%
47Wales village (south-southwest)4.4%
48Elm Grove village (south-southeast)4.2%
49Menomonee Falls village (southwest)4.1%
50Elm Grove village (west-southwest)4%
51New Berlin city (east-southeast 2)4%
52Dousman village (northwest)3.9%
53New Berlin city (east)3.9%
54North Prairie village3.8%
55Muskego city (west)3.7%
56New Berlin city (south-southeast 1)3.7%
57Waukesha city (south)3.7%
58Lannon village (west-southwest)3.6%
59Waukesha village (south)3.6%
60Hartland village (south-southeast)3.5%
61Butler village (south-southwest)3.4%
62Lannon village (southeast)3.4%
63Merton village (northeast)3.3%
64New Berlin city (south-southeast 2)3.3%
65Sussex village (southwest)3.3%
66New Berlin city (east-northeast)3.2%
67Muskego city (southwest)3.1%
68Wales village (south-southeast)2.8%
69Mukwonago village (east)2.6%
70Nashotah village (east-southeast)2.6%
71Vernon village (south)2.5%
72Big Bend village (west-southwest)2.4%
73Dousman village (southeast)2.4%
74North Lake CDP (east)2.4%
75Okauchee Lake CDP (southeast)2.4%
76Merton village (southwest)2.3%
77Butler village (west-northwest)2.2%
78Eagle village (east)2.2%
79Elm Grove village (north-northeast)2.2%
80Nashotah village (west-northwest)2.2%
81Sussex village (north)2.2%
82Vernon village (north)2.2%
83Chenequa village (northwest)2%
84Mukwonago village (west)2%
85Menomonee Falls village (east-southeast)1.9%
86Waukesha village (east-southeast)1.8%
87Brookfield city (north-northeast)1.5%
88Elm Grove village (east-northeast)1.5%
89Wales village (east-southeast)1.5%
90New Berlin city (east-southeast 1)1.4%
91Wales village (west)1.3%
92Muskego city (northeast)1.2%
93Pewaukee village (east)1.2%
94Big Bend village (east-northeast)1.1%
95Pewaukee city (west-northwest)1%
96Elm Grove village (north-northwest)0.8%
97North Lake CDP (west)0.8%
98Oconomowoc city (north)0.4%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.