Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Sanford area census tracts by vacant homes

Vacant homes is highest in Sanford city (north) (24.9%). This table ranks 89 eligible mapped census tracts.

Vacant homes values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaVacant homes
1Sanford city (north)24.9%
2Altamonte Springs city (northwest)13%
3Forest City CDP (east)12.5%
4Sanford city (east)12.5%
5Geneva CDP (north)12%
6Forest City CDP (northeast)11.1%
7Lake Mary city (northeast)11.1%
8Forest City CDP (south)10.9%
9Sanford city (southwest)10.7%
10Forest City CDP (east-southeast)10.5%
11Sanford city (north-northwest)10.2%
12Black Hammock CDP (north)10.1%
13Forest City CDP (northwest)10.1%
14Fern Park CDP (west-northwest)10%
15Goldenrod CDP (east-northeast 2)9.9%
16Heathrow CDP (north-northeast)9.6%
17Sanford city (west)9.5%
18Goldenrod CDP (northwest)9.4%
19Sanford city (north-northeast)9.4%
20Oviedo city (northwest)9.3%
21Sanford city (south-southwest)9%
22Fern Park CDP (east)8.9%
23Longwood city (east-southeast)8.9%
24Heathrow CDP (south)8.4%
25Sanford city (south-southeast 1)8.2%
26Lake Mary city (southwest 2)8.1%
27Lake Mary city (north-northeast)8%
28Wekiwa Springs CDP (southeast)7.9%
29Black Hammock CDP (east)7.8%
30Oviedo city (south-southwest)7.5%
31Casselberry city (east)7.3%
32Lake Mary city (south-southwest)7.3%
33Altamonte Springs city (south-southeast 2)7.1%
34Black Hammock CDP (west)7%
35Oviedo city (north-northwest)7%
36Midway CDP (south-southwest)6.8%
37Wekiwa Springs CDP (east-northeast)6.7%
38Heathrow CDP (northeast)6.3%
39Casselberry city (west 1)6.2%
40Goldenrod CDP (west-southwest)6.2%
41Wekiwa Springs CDP (south)6.2%
42Altamonte Springs city (north)6%
43Casselberry city (north-northeast)5.9%
44Longwood city (east)5.9%
45Black Hammock CDP (south-southwest)5.7%
46Lake Mary city (north-northwest)5.7%
47Chuluota CDP (west-southwest 2)5.4%
48Oviedo city (south-southeast)5.4%
49Casselberry city (southeast)5.3%
50Black Hammock CDP (south-southeast)5.1%
51Heathrow CDP (south-southwest)4.7%
52Longwood city (west-southwest 1)4.7%
53Lake Mary city (west-northwest)4.6%
54Altamonte Springs city (northeast)4.5%
55Lake Mary city (east-northeast)4.5%
56Midway CDP (northwest)4.5%
57Altamonte Springs city (west-northwest)4.4%
58Heathrow CDP (southwest)4.2%
59Goldenrod CDP (south)4.1%
60Forest City CDP (west-southwest)4%
61Heathrow CDP (north-northwest)3.9%
62Sanford city (south-southeast 2)3.9%
63Fern Park CDP (south)3.8%
64Goldenrod CDP (southwest)3.8%
65Casselberry city (east-southeast)3.4%
66Forest City CDP (west)3.2%
67Longwood city (north-northwest)3.2%
68Midway CDP (east-northeast)3.2%
69Goldenrod CDP (east-northeast 1)3.1%
70Altamonte Springs city (south-southwest)2.9%
71Wekiwa Springs CDP (north)2.8%
72Black Hammock CDP (west-southwest)2.7%
73Casselberry city (west 2)2.6%
74Casselberry city (west-southwest)2.3%
75Lake Mary city (southwest 1)2.3%
76Black Hammock CDP (northeast)1.9%
77Black Hammock CDP (southeast)1.9%
78Chuluota CDP (east-northeast)1.3%
79Wekiwa Springs CDP (west-southwest 2)0.7%
80Casselberry city (north-northwest)0.3%
81Altamonte Springs city (south-southeast 1)0%
82Black Hammock CDP (northwest)0%
83Casselberry city (south-southwest)0%
84Chuluota CDP (west-southwest 1)0%
85Geneva CDP (south)0%
86Lake Mary city (southeast)0%
87Longwood city (west-southwest 2)0%
88Oviedo city (northeast)0%
89Wekiwa Springs CDP (west-southwest 1)0%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.