Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Sanford area census tracts by residents below the poverty level

Residents below the poverty level is highest in Sanford city (north-northwest) (36.5%). This table ranks 89 eligible mapped census tracts.

Residents below the poverty level values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaResidents below the poverty level
1Sanford city (north-northwest)36.5%
2Sanford city (south-southeast 1)34.7%
3Casselberry city (west 1)32.4%
4Sanford city (south-southwest)25.6%
5Sanford city (west)24.8%
6Oviedo city (south-southeast)23.8%
7Sanford city (southwest)19.7%
8Wekiwa Springs CDP (southeast)18.8%
9Heathrow CDP (northeast)18.5%
10Midway CDP (northwest)17.6%
11Altamonte Springs city (south-southeast 2)17.2%
12Forest City CDP (east-southeast)15.5%
13Goldenrod CDP (east-northeast 1)15.5%
14Casselberry city (west-southwest)14.7%
15Fern Park CDP (west-northwest)14.7%
16Goldenrod CDP (south)14.5%
17Casselberry city (east-southeast)13.8%
18Forest City CDP (northwest)13.6%
19Altamonte Springs city (northwest)12.3%
20Goldenrod CDP (northwest)12.2%
21Lake Mary city (southwest 2)12.2%
22Chuluota CDP (east-northeast)11.9%
23Longwood city (east)11.9%
24Sanford city (north-northeast)11.6%
25Casselberry city (west 2)11.4%
26Oviedo city (northwest)11.4%
27Midway CDP (south-southwest)11.3%
28Altamonte Springs city (northeast)11.2%
29Goldenrod CDP (east-northeast 2)11%
30Altamonte Springs city (north)10.6%
31Black Hammock CDP (west-southwest)10.6%
32Lake Mary city (east-northeast)10.6%
33Forest City CDP (south)10.5%
34Goldenrod CDP (southwest)10.3%
35Forest City CDP (west)10.1%
36Oviedo city (north-northwest)9.7%
37Fern Park CDP (south)9.6%
38Casselberry city (north-northwest)9.4%
39Chuluota CDP (west-southwest 2)9.1%
40Forest City CDP (east)9%
41Lake Mary city (south-southwest)9%
42Wekiwa Springs CDP (east-northeast)8.7%
43Black Hammock CDP (south-southeast)8.5%
44Goldenrod CDP (west-southwest)8.5%
45Longwood city (east-southeast)8.5%
46Altamonte Springs city (south-southwest)8.2%
47Lake Mary city (southwest 1)8%
48Sanford city (east)7.8%
49Geneva CDP (south)7.7%
50Longwood city (west-southwest 1)7.3%
51Longwood city (west-southwest 2)7.2%
52Midway CDP (east-northeast)7.2%
53Fern Park CDP (east)7.1%
54Casselberry city (south-southwest)7%
55Black Hammock CDP (southeast)6.7%
56Casselberry city (east)6.7%
57Sanford city (south-southeast 2)6.7%
58Sanford city (north)6.6%
59Heathrow CDP (south)6.3%
60Lake Mary city (north-northwest)6.2%
61Longwood city (north-northwest)6%
62Heathrow CDP (north-northeast)5.5%
63Casselberry city (north-northeast)5.3%
64Forest City CDP (west-southwest)5.3%
65Lake Mary city (northeast)5.3%
66Oviedo city (northeast)5.2%
67Black Hammock CDP (west)5%
68Casselberry city (southeast)5%
69Black Hammock CDP (northwest)4.8%
70Geneva CDP (north)4.8%
71Black Hammock CDP (east)4.6%
72Wekiwa Springs CDP (south)4.6%
73Wekiwa Springs CDP (west-southwest 2)4.5%
74Heathrow CDP (south-southwest)4.4%
75Black Hammock CDP (northeast)3.9%
76Oviedo city (south-southwest)3.7%
77Heathrow CDP (southwest)3.3%
78Forest City CDP (northeast)3.2%
79Altamonte Springs city (west-northwest)3.1%
80Black Hammock CDP (south-southwest)3.1%
81Altamonte Springs city (south-southeast 1)2.8%
82Lake Mary city (north-northeast)2.8%
83Chuluota CDP (west-southwest 1)2.5%
84Wekiwa Springs CDP (west-southwest 1)2.5%
85Black Hammock CDP (north)2.1%
86Lake Mary city (southeast)2.1%
87Lake Mary city (west-northwest)1.8%
88Wekiwa Springs CDP (north)1.8%
89Heathrow CDP (north-northwest)1.6%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.