Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Casa Grande area census tracts by workers working from home

Workers working from home is highest in Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1) (39.5%). This table ranks 94 eligible mapped census tracts.

Workers working from home values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaWorkers working from home
1Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1)39.5%
2Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 2)36.1%
3Apache Junction city (north-northwest 3)33.9%
4Apache Junction city (east-southeast)32.3%
5Sacaton Flats Village CDP (southeast)29.9%
6Cactus Forest CDP (southeast)29.3%
7Kearny town (west-northwest 1)27.4%
8Saddlebrooke CDP (southwest)25.6%
9Queen Valley CDP (southeast)25.4%
10Maricopa city (east-northeast)25.1%
11San Tan Valley CDP (south-southwest)24.6%
12Sacate Village CDP (west)23.4%
13Kearny town (northwest)22.9%
14Coolidge city (southwest)22.6%
15Florence town (west)22.5%
16Apache Junction city (north-northwest 2)22.4%
17Ak-Chin Village CDP (north-northeast)22%
18Apache Junction city (north-northwest 1)21.7%
19Coolidge city (northwest)21.7%
20Maricopa city (west 2)21.3%
21Saddlebrooke CDP (northeast)21.3%
22Apache Junction city (north 1)21%
23Queen Valley CDP (east)20.5%
24San Tan Valley CDP (east-southeast)20.5%
25Florence town (south-southeast)20.3%
26Queen Valley CDP (north)20.3%
27Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 2)19.6%
28Maricopa city (west 1)19.6%
29Queen Valley CDP (west 4)19.1%
30Apache Junction city (south 1)17.9%
31Florence town (northeast)17.5%
32Maricopa city (southeast)17.5%
33San Tan Valley CDP (northeast)16.5%
34Kearny town (east)15.7%
35San Tan Valley CDP (west)15.5%
36Arizona City CDP (east)15.4%
37Apache Junction city (northeast)15.3%
38Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 1)15.2%
39Ak-Chin Village CDP (south-southwest)15.2%
40Maricopa city (north)14.6%
41Sacaton Flats Village CDP (north-northwest)14.4%
42Apache Junction city (south 2)13.6%
43Casa Grande city (south-southwest)13.4%
44Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 1)13.3%
45Kearny town (south-southeast 2)12.7%
46Sacate Village CDP (east-southeast)12.6%
47Florence town (northwest)12.2%
48Vaiva Vo CDP (northeast)12.1%
49Sacaton Flats Village CDP (northeast)11.8%
50Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-northwest)11.7%
51Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northwest)11.6%
52Casa Grande city (northeast)11.3%
53Coolidge city (east)10.8%
54San Tan Valley CDP (northwest)10.7%
55Ak-Chin Village CDP (west)10.6%
56Apache Junction city (south 3)10.6%
57Casa Grande city (west)9.8%
58Kearny town (west-northwest 2)9.7%
59Coolidge city (northeast)9.2%
60Casa Grande city (south-southeast)9.1%
61Superior town8.9%
62Kearny town (north-northwest)8.8%
63Dudleyville CDP (west)8.5%
64Eloy city (east-southeast)8.4%
65Coolidge city (south)8.3%
66Queen Valley CDP (northwest)8.3%
67Casa Grande city (northwest)8.2%
68Red Rock CDP (southeast)7.7%
69Apache Junction city (north 2)7.5%
70Cactus Forest CDP (southwest)7.4%
71Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 2)7.1%
72Casa Grande city (north-northwest)7%
73Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northeast)6.1%
74Dudleyville CDP (east)5.7%
75Eloy city (west-northwest)5.6%
76Apache Junction city (north-northeast 2)5.3%
77Cactus Forest CDP (west-northwest)5.1%
78Casa Grande city (east)5%
79Vaiva Vo CDP (east)5%
80Casa Grande city (west-southwest)4.5%
81Arizona City CDP (west)4.2%
82Cactus Forest CDP (north-northwest)4%
83Queen Valley CDP (west 1)4%
84Queen Valley CDP (west 2)2.8%
85Apache Junction city (north-northeast 1)2.5%
86Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest)2.4%
87Queen Valley CDP (west 3)1.2%
88Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-southwest)0.6%
89San Manuel CDP0.1%
90Cactus Forest CDP (north)0%
91Cactus Forest CDP (northeast)0%
92Kearny town (south)0%
93Red Rock CDP (northwest)0%
94Vaiva Vo CDP (southwest)0%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.