Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Casa Grande area census tracts by residents below the poverty level

Residents below the poverty level is highest in Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest) (37%). This table ranks 94 eligible mapped census tracts.

Residents below the poverty level values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaResidents below the poverty level
1Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest)37%
2Cactus Forest CDP (west-northwest)34.3%
3Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-southwest)32.6%
4Vaiva Vo CDP (east)31.1%
5Eloy city (east-southeast)27.8%
6Casa Grande city (west)26.7%
7Dudleyville CDP (east)26.7%
8Casa Grande city (south-southwest)26.3%
9Kearny town (south)25%
10Red Rock CDP (northwest)24.5%
11Eloy city (west-northwest)22.8%
12Queen Valley CDP (west 3)21.4%
13San Manuel CDP21.4%
14Casa Grande city (northwest)21.3%
15Casa Grande city (south-southeast)19.4%
16Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northeast)19.2%
17Cactus Forest CDP (southwest)18.8%
18Ak-Chin Village CDP (south-southwest)17.4%
19Queen Valley CDP (west 4)17.3%
20Queen Valley CDP (west 2)17.2%
21Cactus Forest CDP (northeast)16.6%
22Queen Valley CDP (west 1)16.1%
23Superior town15.8%
24Sacaton Flats Village CDP (southeast)15.7%
25Maricopa city (east-northeast)15.4%
26Coolidge city (east)15.2%
27Coolidge city (northeast)14%
28Coolidge city (south)13.4%
29Kearny town (west-northwest 1)13.4%
30Coolidge city (northwest)13%
31Florence town (northwest)13%
32Queen Valley CDP (east)12.9%
33Vaiva Vo CDP (southwest)12.8%
34Dudleyville CDP (west)12.6%
35San Tan Valley CDP (northeast)12.3%
36Sacaton Flats Village CDP (north-northwest)11.7%
37Kearny town (south-southeast 2)11.6%
38Queen Valley CDP (north)11.3%
39Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 2)11.1%
40Apache Junction city (north-northwest 1)11.1%
41Apache Junction city (north 1)10.8%
42Arizona City CDP (west)10.8%
43Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northwest)10.7%
44Kearny town (east)9.7%
45Vaiva Vo CDP (northeast)9.7%
46San Tan Valley CDP (west)9.5%
47Apache Junction city (north-northeast 1)9.4%
48Apache Junction city (northeast)9.4%
49Ak-Chin Village CDP (north-northeast)8.9%
50Arizona City CDP (east)8.8%
51Cactus Forest CDP (southeast)8.7%
52Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 1)8.5%
53Casa Grande city (east)8.4%
54Casa Grande city (northeast)8.3%
55Kearny town (west-northwest 2)7.6%
56Queen Valley CDP (northwest)7.6%
57Apache Junction city (south 3)7.5%
58Apache Junction city (north-northeast 2)7.3%
59Sacaton Flats Village CDP (northeast)7.1%
60Kearny town (north-northwest)7%
61Apache Junction city (north-northwest 3)6.7%
62Casa Grande city (north-northwest)6.7%
63Coolidge city (southwest)6.4%
64Apache Junction city (north-northwest 2)6.2%
65Florence town (northeast)6.1%
66Kearny town (northwest)5.8%
67Sacate Village CDP (east-southeast)5.6%
68Casa Grande city (west-southwest)5.4%
69Red Rock CDP (southeast)5.4%
70Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 2)5.4%
71Florence town (west)5.2%
72Maricopa city (north)5.1%
73Cactus Forest CDP (north-northwest)5%
74Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-northwest)5%
75Saddlebrooke CDP (northeast)5%
76Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 1)4.9%
77San Tan Valley CDP (south-southwest)4.9%
78Apache Junction city (south 1)4.6%
79Maricopa city (southeast)4.6%
80Apache Junction city (north 2)3.9%
81Queen Valley CDP (southeast)3.9%
82Sacate Village CDP (west)3.8%
83Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1)3.8%
84San Tan Valley CDP (east-southeast)3.8%
85Maricopa city (west 1)3.3%
86Apache Junction city (south 2)3.2%
87Maricopa city (west 2)3%
88Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 2)2.9%
89Saddlebrooke CDP (southwest)2.6%
90Ak-Chin Village CDP (west)2.5%
91San Tan Valley CDP (northwest)2.4%
92Florence town (south-southeast)2.1%
93Apache Junction city (east-southeast)1.5%
94Cactus Forest CDP (north)0%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.