Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Casa Grande area census tracts by owner-occupied homes

Owner-occupied homes is highest in Cactus Forest CDP (north) (100%). This table ranks 94 eligible mapped census tracts.

Owner-occupied homes values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

View this measure on the mapAll Casa Grande area rankings
#Census tract areaOwner-occupied homes
1Cactus Forest CDP (north)100%
2Apache Junction city (east-southeast)97.9%
3Coolidge city (northwest)97.5%
4Saddlebrooke CDP (southwest)97.1%
5Apache Junction city (north-northwest 3)96.9%
6Sacate Village CDP (west)96.6%
7Queen Valley CDP (southeast)96.4%
8Sacaton Flats Village CDP (southeast)96.2%
9Saddlebrooke CDP (northeast)95.3%
10Florence town (south-southeast)94.9%
11Queen Valley CDP (northwest)94.8%
12San Tan Valley CDP (east-southeast)93.6%
13Coolidge city (southwest)93.5%
14Red Rock CDP (southeast)93.2%
15Kearny town (west-northwest 1)92.3%
16Florence town (northeast)92.1%
17Kearny town (south)90.7%
18Apache Junction city (north-northwest 2)90.4%
19Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 2)90.4%
20Apache Junction city (south 1)90.1%
21Queen Valley CDP (north)89.6%
22Coolidge city (east)89.4%
23Dudleyville CDP (west)89.1%
24Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-northwest)88.5%
25Red Rock CDP (northwest)88.4%
26Sacate Village CDP (east-southeast)87.8%
27Queen Valley CDP (east)87.6%
28San Tan Valley CDP (northwest)86.8%
29Sacaton Flats Village CDP (north-northwest)86.6%
30San Tan Valley CDP (south-southwest)86.6%
31Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 1)86.5%
32Ak-Chin Village CDP (west)86.4%
33Florence town (west)86.4%
34Apache Junction city (north 2)85.7%
35Apache Junction city (northeast)85.6%
36Kearny town (northwest)85.5%
37Queen Valley CDP (west 4)85.3%
38Maricopa city (north)84.1%
39Ak-Chin Village CDP (north-northeast)83.6%
40Coolidge city (south)83.4%
41San Tan Valley CDP (west)83%
42San Tan Valley CDP (northeast)82.5%
43Kearny town (north-northwest)81.9%
44San Manuel CDP81.8%
45Cactus Forest CDP (southeast)81.7%
46Kearny town (east)81.7%
47Casa Grande city (west-southwest)81.5%
48Maricopa city (west 2)81.3%
49Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 1)81.3%
50Apache Junction city (north-northwest 1)81%
51Queen Valley CDP (west 2)81%
52Apache Junction city (south 3)80.7%
53Maricopa city (southeast)80.5%
54Arizona City CDP (east)80.3%
55Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1)80.2%
56Dudleyville CDP (east)79.5%
57Cactus Forest CDP (southwest)79.1%
58Casa Grande city (south-southeast)78%
59Maricopa city (west 1)77.6%
60Maricopa city (east-northeast)76.7%
61Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 2)76.5%
62Arizona City CDP (west)76.5%
63Florence town (northwest)76%
64Vaiva Vo CDP (northeast)75.4%
65Casa Grande city (north-northwest)74.2%
66Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northwest)74%
67Coolidge city (northeast)72.9%
68Vaiva Vo CDP (east)72.9%
69Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 2)72.3%
70Queen Valley CDP (west 1)72.2%
71Kearny town (west-northwest 2)72.1%
72Apache Junction city (north 1)71.6%
73Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-southwest)71.4%
74Superior town71.2%
75Vaiva Vo CDP (southwest)70.1%
76Ak-Chin Village CDP (south-southwest)69.8%
77Casa Grande city (east)69.6%
78Casa Grande city (northeast)68.4%
79Sacaton Flats Village CDP (northeast)65.6%
80Eloy city (west-northwest)64.7%
81Kearny town (south-southeast 2)63.9%
82Casa Grande city (northwest)62.9%
83Cactus Forest CDP (northeast)61.4%
84Apache Junction city (north-northeast 1)61.2%
85Queen Valley CDP (west 3)60.7%
86Apache Junction city (south 2)59.5%
87Apache Junction city (north-northeast 2)57.4%
88Casa Grande city (west)55.9%
89Cactus Forest CDP (north-northwest)54.3%
90Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northeast)53.4%
91Cactus Forest CDP (west-northwest)52.6%
92Eloy city (east-southeast)51.5%
93Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest)49.5%
94Casa Grande city (south-southwest)41.7%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.