Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Casa Grande area census tracts by hispanic or latino residents

Hispanic or Latino residents is highest in Eloy city (east-southeast) (73.9%). This table ranks 95 eligible mapped census tracts.

Hispanic or Latino residents values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaHispanic or Latino residents
1Eloy city (east-southeast)73.9%
2Vaiva Vo CDP (east)65%
3Dudleyville CDP (east)63%
4Casa Grande city (west)60.4%
5Superior town59.7%
6Coolidge city (northeast)58.4%
7Eloy city (west-northwest)54.4%
8Ak-Chin Village CDP (west)51.2%
9Casa Grande city (west-southwest)49.8%
10Red Rock CDP (northwest)48.8%
11Cactus Forest CDP (west-northwest)48.7%
12Vaiva Vo CDP (southwest)48.4%
13Sacate Village CDP (east-southeast)48.1%
14San Manuel CDP48.1%
15Casa Grande city (south-southeast)47.5%
16Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northwest)47.4%
17Casa Grande city (south-southwest)46.7%
18Cactus Forest CDP (north)45.3%
19Casa Grande city (northeast)45.1%
20Maricopa city (east-northeast)43.4%
21Kearny town (south-southeast 1)43%
22Coolidge city (east)42.9%
23Casa Grande city (northwest)42.7%
24Kearny town (south-southeast 2)42.6%
25Maricopa city (southeast)42.6%
26Cactus Forest CDP (northeast)41%
27Arizona City CDP (west)39.2%
28Kearny town (west-northwest 2)38.4%
29Cactus Forest CDP (southwest)37.6%
30Kearny town (east)36.8%
31San Tan Valley CDP (west)36.1%
32Casa Grande city (north-northwest)35.8%
33Florence town (west)34.6%
34Cactus Forest CDP (north-northwest)34.4%
35Vaiva Vo CDP (northeast)34%
36Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 1)33%
37Dudleyville CDP (west)32.3%
38Coolidge city (south)32.2%
39Ak-Chin Village CDP (south-southwest)31.1%
40Kearny town (north-northwest)30.9%
41Sacaton Flats Village CDP (northeast)30.8%
42Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 2)30.2%
43Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northeast)29.6%
44Sacaton Flats Village CDP (north-northwest)29.5%
45Queen Valley CDP (west 4)29.4%
46San Tan Valley CDP (northwest)29.3%
47Apache Junction city (north-northeast 2)28.8%
48Sacaton Flats Village CDP (southeast)28.4%
49Ak-Chin Village CDP (north-northeast)28%
50Queen Valley CDP (north)27.4%
51Casa Grande city (east)27%
52San Tan Valley CDP (south-southwest)27%
53Florence town (northwest)26.8%
54Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 2)24.6%
55San Tan Valley CDP (east-southeast)24.5%
56Arizona City CDP (east)24.1%
57Apache Junction city (north-northwest 1)24%
58Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-southwest)24%
59Maricopa city (north)23.7%
60Maricopa city (west 1)23.4%
61Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 1)22.8%
62San Tan Valley CDP (northeast)22.8%
63Apache Junction city (north 1)22.4%
64Kearny town (northwest)21.9%
65Coolidge city (southwest)20.3%
66Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest)20.3%
67Red Rock CDP (southeast)19.9%
68Maricopa city (west 2)19.5%
69Apache Junction city (south 2)19.4%
70Florence town (northeast)18.6%
71Apache Junction city (north-northeast 1)17%
72Kearny town (west-northwest 1)17%
73Apache Junction city (north-northwest 2)16.9%
74Queen Valley CDP (west 3)16.9%
75Saddlebrooke CDP (southwest)16%
76Cactus Forest CDP (southeast)15%
77Apache Junction city (north 2)14.9%
78Coolidge city (northwest)14.9%
79Queen Valley CDP (west 2)13.4%
80Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-northwest)13.3%
81Apache Junction city (south 3)13.2%
82Apache Junction city (northeast)12.1%
83Queen Valley CDP (northwest)11.9%
84Kearny town (south)11.2%
85Apache Junction city (south 1)11.1%
86Queen Valley CDP (southeast)10.9%
87Queen Valley CDP (west 1)10.9%
88Queen Valley CDP (east)10.1%
89Florence town (south-southeast)9.5%
90Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1)8.9%
91Apache Junction city (east-southeast)6%
92Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 2)5.8%
93Sacate Village CDP (west)3.9%
94Apache Junction city (north-northwest 3)2.6%
95Saddlebrooke CDP (northeast)1%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.