Census Data Map

American Community Survey 2019–2023

Casa Grande area census tracts by foreign-born residents

Foreign-born residents is highest in Red Rock CDP (northwest) (26.7%). This table ranks 95 eligible mapped census tracts.

Foreign-born residents values are ACS five-year survey estimates. Percentage and median rankings exclude tracts below 500 residents; this reduces but does not eliminate sampling uncertainty.

#Census tract areaForeign-born residents
1Red Rock CDP (northwest)26.7%
2Eloy city (west-northwest)25.9%
3Kearny town (south-southeast 1)23.9%
4Apache Junction city (north 2)23.2%
5Sacate Village CDP (east-southeast)22.2%
6Ak-Chin Village CDP (west)20.5%
7Vaiva Vo CDP (southwest)20.2%
8Cactus Forest CDP (southwest)18.7%
9Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northwest)17.1%
10Vaiva Vo CDP (east)16.7%
11Queen Valley CDP (north)16.5%
12Kearny town (north-northwest)15.8%
13Eloy city (east-southeast)15.5%
14Cactus Forest CDP (northeast)15.1%
15Apache Junction city (east-southeast)14.7%
16Coolidge city (east)13.9%
17Vaiva Vo CDP (northeast)13.7%
18Casa Grande city (northeast)13.5%
19Florence town (west)13.5%
20Ak-Chin Village CDP (north-northeast)13.4%
21Apache Junction city (north-northwest 1)13.2%
22Casa Grande city (west-southwest)13.2%
23San Tan Valley CDP (west)13%
24Sacaton Flats Village CDP (north-northwest)12.9%
25Cactus Forest CDP (west-northwest)12.7%
26Coolidge city (southwest)12.5%
27Kearny town (south-southeast 2)12.5%
28Maricopa city (west 2)12.1%
29Cactus Forest CDP (north)12%
30Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 2)11.8%
31Maricopa city (east-northeast)11.5%
32Saddlebrooke CDP (southwest)11.4%
33Maricopa city (north)11.1%
34Arizona City CDP (west)11%
35Kearny town (west-northwest 2)10.8%
36Florence town (northwest)10.5%
37Casa Grande city (northwest)9.7%
38Casa Grande city (south-southeast)9.7%
39Coolidge city (northwest)9.6%
40Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 2)9.5%
41Ak-Chin Village CDP (south-southwest)9.5%
42Queen Valley CDP (west 1)9.5%
43Coolidge city (northeast)8.7%
44Superior town8.7%
45Casa Grande city (west)8.3%
46Casa Grande city (south-southwest)8.2%
47Apache Junction city (north-northwest 2)8.1%
48San Tan Valley CDP (south-southwest)8.1%
49Coolidge city (south)7.7%
50Kearny town (south)7.6%
51Dudleyville CDP (west)7.5%
52Maricopa city (west 1)7.5%
53Apache Junction city (north 1)7.3%
54Casa Grande city (north-northwest)7.3%
55Ak-Chin Village CDP (northeast 1)7.2%
56Dudleyville CDP (east)7.2%
57Florence town (south-southeast)7.1%
58Apache Junction city (south 3)6.9%
59Cactus Forest CDP (southeast)6.9%
60Sacate Village CDP (west-northwest 1)6.9%
61Casa Grande city (east)6.7%
62Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-northwest)6.7%
63San Tan Valley CDP (northwest)6.5%
64Vaiva Vo CDP (north-northeast)6.2%
65Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 2)6.1%
66Red Rock CDP (southeast)5.9%
67Sacaton Flats Village CDP (northeast)5.9%
68Saddlebrooke CDP (northeast)5.8%
69Sacate Village CDP (north-northwest)5.7%
70Maricopa city (southeast)5.4%
71Florence town (northeast)5.3%
72Sacate Village CDP (west)4.8%
73San Tan Valley CDP (northeast)4.6%
74Queen Valley CDP (west 4)4.5%
75Cactus Forest CDP (north-northwest)4.4%
76Queen Valley CDP (west 3)4.4%
77Sacaton Flats Village CDP (east-northeast 1)4.4%
78Apache Junction city (northeast)4.3%
79Queen Valley CDP (southeast)4.3%
80Apache Junction city (north-northeast 2)4.2%
81Queen Valley CDP (east)4.1%
82Queen Valley CDP (west 2)4.1%
83Kearny town (east)4%
84Kearny town (west-northwest 1)4%
85San Tan Valley CDP (east-southeast)4%
86San Manuel CDP3.9%
87Sacaton Flats Village CDP (southeast)3.8%
88Apache Junction city (north-northwest 3)3.6%
89Arizona City CDP (east)3.6%
90Apache Junction city (south 2)3.5%
91Apache Junction city (north-northeast 1)3.3%
92Queen Valley CDP (northwest)3.2%
93Kearny town (northwest)2.6%
94Sacaton Flats Village CDP (west-southwest)2.5%
95Apache Junction city (south 1)1.9%

Method and source

Values come from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2019–2023 five-year estimates. Census tracts are small statistical areas, not necessarily neighbourhood boundaries. The result is a descriptive comparison of the mapped area, not a measure of individual households or a prediction. Read about the American Community Survey.